Why Not All Wines Are Created Equal: Glyphosate Concerns and Health Impacts. North Port, Florida.
- smacs2000
- Dec 31, 2025
- 4 min read

In Port Charlotte, Florida, where enjoying a glass of wine pairs perfectly with our coastal lifestyle, not all wines are created equal—especially when it comes to pesticide residues like glyphosate. At PCP Health, your primary care provider in Port Charlotte, we emphasize functional medicine to address how environmental toxins affect gut health and overall wellness. This Q&A blog dives into glyphosate in wine, its gut effects, why California wines often test high for pesticides, safer alternatives, and the role of European regulations, including no GMO grapes. Supported by peer-reviewed research, these insights help Port Charlotte residents make healthier choices. If gut issues or toxin exposure concern you, our team at PCP Health is here for personalized consultations.
Why are not all wines created equal?
Wines vary significantly due to farming practices, pesticide use, and regulations, leading to differences in residue levels like glyphosate. Conventional wines, especially from regions with intensive agriculture, may contain higher pesticides, while organic or European options often have lower residues. This inequality affects health, as residues can impact the gut microbiome and beyond. In Port Charlotte, choosing wisely supports our active Florida lifestyles without unnecessary toxin exposure.
What is glyphosate and how does it relate to wine?
Glyphosate is a common herbicide used in vineyards to control weeds, leaving residues in grapes and thus in wine. Studies detect it in various wines, with levels varying by region and farming method. For Port Charlotte wine enthusiasts, awareness of these residues is key to minimizing dietary pesticide intake.
What does glyphosate do to one's gut?
Glyphosate disrupts the gut microbiome by altering bacterial composition, reducing beneficial species like Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and promoting dysbiosis, which can lead to inflammation, impaired metabolism, and gastrointestinal issues. Low-dose exposure, common in food like wine, affects gut homeostasis and may influence the gut-brain axis, contributing to broader health concerns. In Port Charlotte, where gut health supports immunity against Florida's humid climate, reducing glyphosate is crucial.
Why have California wines been tested with the highest concentration of pesticides?
California's intensive viticulture and reliance on herbicides like glyphosate result in higher residues, with studies showing levels up to 30 times above detection limits in some wines. Factors include large-scale farming and less stringent organic transitions compared to other regions. For Port Charlotte importers and consumers, this highlights the need to scrutinize labels.
What can be done about glyphosate in wine?
To minimize exposure, opt for organic wines, which show significantly lower pesticide residues. Support initiatives like Napa Green's glyphosate phase-out and choose certified low-pesticide options. At PCP Health in Port Charlotte, we recommend gut detox protocols and testing for toxin burdens to address any impacts.
Why are European choices safer?
European wines benefit from stricter EU regulations, including lower maximum residue limits (MRLs) and emphasis on resistant grape varieties, reducing pesticide needs. This leads to fewer residues compared to U.S. wines. For Port Charlotte oenophiles, importing European varieties offers a safer sip.
Why does the EU not use GMO grapes?
The EU prohibits GMO grapes under precautionary principles, banning cultivation and importation of genetically modified vines to protect biodiversity and consumer health. This stance avoids potential risks associated with GMOs, contrasting with some U.S. practices.
Taking Action in Port Charlotte
Concerned about glyphosate or gut health? PCP Health in Port Charlotte, Florida, offers functional medicine consultations to detox and optimize wellness. Visit www.pcp-health.com or call our Port Charlotte office today.
References:
Bolognesi, G., Gervasoni, G., Lodi, S., Sangiorgi, S., Marchesini, I., & Marzadori, C. (2016). Glyphosate impacts on polyphenolic composition in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) berries and wine. Food Chemistry, 213, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.06.051
Tariba Lovaković, B. (2021). Glyphosate use, toxicity and occurrence in food. Foods, 10(11), 2785. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112785
Puigbò, P., Leino, L. I., Rainio, M. J., Saikkonen, K., Saloniemi, I., & Helander, M. (2022). Does glyphosate affect the human microbiota? Life, 12(5), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12050707
Wang, L., Li, X., Chen, Y., & Liu, L. (2024). Glyphosate: Impact on the microbiota-gut-brain axis and the immune-nervous system. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 269, 115823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115823
Tang, Q., Tang, J., Ren, X., & Li, C. (2020). Glyphosate exposure induces inflammatory responses in the small intestine and alters gut microbial composition in rats. Environmental Pollution, 261, 114129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114129
Lehman, P. C., Cady, N., Ghimire, S., Shahi, S. K., Shrode, R. L., Lehmler, H.-J., & Mangalam, A. K. (2023). Low-dose glyphosate exposure alters gut microbiota composition and modulates gut homeostasis. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 100, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2023.104149
Mesnage, R., Teixeira, M., Mandrioli, D., Falcioni, L., Ducarmon, Q. R., Zwittink, R. D., Mazzacuva, F., Caldwell, A., Halket, J., Amiel, C., Panoff, J.-M., Belpoggi, F., & Antoniou, M. N. (2021). Use of shotgun metagenomics and metabolomics to evaluate the impact of glyphosate or Roundup MON 52276 on the gut microbiota and serum metabolome of Sprague-Dawley rats. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(1), 017005. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6990
Čuš, F., Česnik, H. B., Bolta, Š. V., & Gregorčič, A. (2010). Pesticide residues and their metabolites in grapes and wines from conventional and organic farming system. Analytical Methods, 13(5), 616–624. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AY02006E
Eriksson, G. (2004). The precautionary principle and genetically modified organisms: A European perspective. Journal of Law and Biosciences, 8(1), lsab012. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab012
Tagliabue, G. (2017). The EU legislation on “GMOs” between nonsense and protectionism: An ongoing Schumpeterian chain of public choices. GM Crops & Food, 8(3), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2016.1270488




Comments